dysoli.blogg.se

1. BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT FULL
2. BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT WINDOWS 10
3. BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT PORTABLE
4. BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT SOFTWARE

Pihole scrubs about 95% of ads from websites and smartphone apps. And the cherry on the sundae is that I run pihole on a raspberry pi to provide my own dns server which blocks known malware and advertising sites for our whole lan.

I also have another "dirty" windows vm for general surfing. But that's highly unlikely since I use the main Windows vm only to connect to trusted banking and brokerage sites. Rdiff-backup keeps 30 daily incremental backups as a defense against a ransomware attack against Windows. Later during the night I run a linux cold, incremental backup using rdiff-backup of the complete Windows vm to a local computer since that's about 80 GB, so too large for the cloud, although the daily differential is quite small.īoth duplicati and rdiff-backup are free and reliable. Then, every night I run automated duplicati backups of the critical data out to three different free cloud services, all encrypted on my computer by duplicati. This is the equivalent of a bare-metal backup of Windows the caveat that recovering from a dead hard drive actually means installing linux and then vmware workstation first, both of which are easier to reinstall than Windows.

BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT FULL

Running Windows as a vm in linux means that, once the vm is shutdown, doing a full backup of Windows is just backing up linux files. For instance, whenever I do anything the least bit risky on Windows, I take a vmware snapshot first, so I can revert to the prior good state if I regret some change I am making, such as updating some software. Windows runs as a vm, which offers numerous advantages. I use an alternate strategy to achieve similar results.

BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT SOFTWARE

I realize that Macrium reflect has a paid version, but I'd like to maintain the flexibility of switching to a different backup/imaging software at some point in the future while still utilizing this encryption setup.

Scenario #1 - Unsure whether decryption will work in Windows Safe mode. Scenario #1 - Unsure whether decryption will work in Windows Safe mode

BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT PORTABLE

Both the Windows installation version and Boxcryptor portable fail when attempting to decrypt in Windows Safe mode. Scenario #1 - Doesn't work since it doesn't appear to be capable of decrypting files in Windows Safe mode. Scenario #2 - No use since it can't encrypt the cloud storage files. However, none of those options appear to work well for both. Local storage alone is easy since I can use Bitlocker and the files are encrypted by default.Ĭloud storage alone is also easy since I could use Boxcryptor, Cryptomator, and Veracrypt. I'd like to avoid having to manually manage the setup once established) End-to-end encryption of files to ensure cloud storage provider doesn't have accessģ.

BOXCRYPTOR VS VERACRYPT WINDOWS 10

Macrium access to files while booted into Windows 10 so that incremental backups function properly.Ģ. I'd also like to maintain certain functionality:ġ. Failure that results in OS no-boot precipitating the need for cloud storage restore. Failure that results in OS no-boot precipitating the need for local restore.Ģ. The scenarios I'm trying to plan for are as follows:ġ. I'm using Macrium Reflect on Windows 10 Professional to backup my computer and am trying to find a good encryption option that makes for easy recovery both locally and on cloud storage.